There are two highly contrasting schools of thought on this subject; one is that all public relations is propaganda, the other states that none of it is.
Pratkanis and Aronson point out that 'Every day we are bombarded with one persuasive communication after another. These appeals persuade not through the manipulation of symbols and of our most basic human emotions. For better or worse, ours is an age of propaganda.' To further this, Grunig and Hunt locate propaganda in the press agency model, the first of their four models: 'Public relations serves a propaganda function in the press agentry/publicity model. Practitioners spread the faith of the organisation involved, often through incomplete, distorted, or half-true information.' This links some public relations activity to propaganda such as advertising. So both PR and propaganda are persuasive mediums, in my view propaganda tries to sculpt an ideal whilst PR tries to show that an ideal has been reached. A contemporary example of persuasive PR that has come to the fore is Tony Blair's spin campaign with Alastair Campbell and Peter Mandelson. An article in the New York Times defines spin as a form of propaganda, achieved through providing an interpretation of an event or campaign to persuade public opinion in favor or against a certain organization or public figure. While traditional public relations may also rely on creative presentation of the facts, "spin" often, though not always, implies disingenuous, deceptive and/or highly manipulative tactics. It was this "propaganda" that discredited Mr. Blair and as a result the majority of what he said was almost immediately dismissed as spin.
This suggests that PR and propaganda go hand in hand together or perhaps more appropriately they each walk across the same tightrope in which one slip could see them discredited.
No comments:
Post a Comment